▶ Video explainer coming soon
The appeals court agreed that the negligence and malpractice claims against the firm, Stonehill, should stay dismissed. Khadem's claim was really about lost money from a delay, not a separate legal duty or physical harm. But the court reached a different result for Meltzer personally. Because Khadem did not have a contract claim against Meltzer individually, and he alleged Meltzer was personally negligent and supervised others who were also negligent, the court said this claim could move forward. The case was sent back so the negligence claim against Meltzer specifically could continue.
John Khadem hired Stonehill & Taylor Architects to design plans for renovating a cooperative unit into an ambulatory surgery center. He claimed errors in the construction plans caused a 19-month delay in opening the center. Khadem sued the firm and one of its officers, Henry Meltzer, for malpractice and negligence, on top of a breach of contract claim. He said the delay caused him to lose revenue. The lower court dismissed both the malpractice and negligence claims against everyone involved. Khadem appealed that decision to a higher New York court.
The main question was whether Khadem could sue for negligence separately from his breach of contract claim. Courts have said a simple contract breach cannot become a tort claim unless there's a duty independent of the contract. The court also had to decide if the officer, Meltzer, could be held personally responsible, separate from the company itself.
This case shows how New York courts separate contract disputes from tort claims like negligence. It clarifies that a company officer can sometimes be sued personally for negligence, even when the company itself cannot be sued in tort for the same events. This matters for anyone entering business contracts with corporations and their officers.
Talk to a licensed personal injury lawyer in New York.