Library / New Jersey / Criminal Defense

Criminal Defense in New Jersey

19 real decisions from New Jersey courts — what happened, what the court held, and why it matters.

The docket · 19 entries

No. 001A-1028-13t2NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1028-13T2 STATE OF NEW JERSRead the case → No. 002A-111-13 State v. Thomas Shannon(074315)Justice SOLOMON, dissenting. The Court held in State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95, 519 A.2d 820 (1987), only that, in recognition of the exclusionary rule’sRead the case → No. 003DCPP VS. P.D. AND A.W.IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF S.D.(FG-02-0082-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED)RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5437-14T4Read the case → No. 004State of New Jersey v. Christopher MazzarisiNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1860-13T4 STATE OF NEW JERSRead the case → No. 005State of New Jersey v. Dharun RaviRECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4667-11T1Read the case → No. 006State of New Jersey v. Julian B. HamlettNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4399-14T2 STATE OF NEW JERSRead the case → No. 007State of New Jersey v. Tawian BacomeNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3734-12T1 STATE OF NEW JERSRead the case → No. 008State of New Jersey v. Tyshon M. NievesNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3379-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEYRead the case → No. 009State of New Jersey v. Yonathan Z. SeligmanNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0496-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEYRead the case → No. 010STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CHRISTOPHER RADEL (16-08-0697, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2503-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSRead the case → No. 011STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. GREGORY A. MARTINEZ (17-05-0586, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3479-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSRead the case → No. 012STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOELLE D. CARONNA STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FREDDY COLLADO (20-02-0221, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0580-20 A-0581-20 STATE OFRead the case → No. 013State v. BrownJUSTICE SOLOMON delivered the opinion of the Court. **502I. Introduction One week after defendants' murder trial began, after counsel made opening statemenRead the case → No. 014State v. Kassey Benjamin(076612)JUSTICE ALBIN dissenting. Defendants convicted of Graves Act offenses are subject to mandatory-minimum periods of incarceration. N.J.SA. 2C:43-6(c). UnderRead the case → No. 015State v. PressleyJUSTICE ALBIN, concurring. **595I concur with the Court's per curiam judgment affirming defendant's conviction in light of the overwhelming evidence of hisRead the case → No. 016State v. Rami A. AmerSYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been nRead the case → No. 017State v. RandolphThe opinion of the court was delivered by KENNEDY, J.A.D. Following a jury trial, defendant was found guilty of various controlled dangerous substance (CDSRead the case → No. 018State v. William L. Witt(074468)*414JUSTICE ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. In this appeal, we are called on to determine whether the constitutional standard governing an automoRead the case → No. 019State v. YoungPER CURIAM **346The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Rothstadt's well-reasoRead the case →

The Index For Attorneys